Today, I received the Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite as a replacement to my current pfSense router. Unless we can run pfSense on any hardware: that would be convenient. By Andrew Senetar - Published: 15 July 2014.
The downside is that instead of following the pfSense documentation we would need to adapt to either iptables or some higher level interface. My preference would be for a small machine / router running GNU/Linux with the required number of ports. In the UK I initially had ADSL and more recently I've moved to FTTP which is directly connected to my OPNsense VM and that also has no problems.Since it turns out buying the recommended pfSense SG-2440 is not possible at the moment, I’m looking for alternatives. I've recently moved back to the UK from France where I had a 1Gb fibre connection for the past four years and ADSL prior to that and never had any problems with OPNsense, my ISP provided the router and I used that in bridge mode. They're no cheap but they are rugged and the seller installed 16GB Ram an M2 ssd and wifi plus he installed OPNsense for me.Īlthough my problem was short lived the Qotom performed well and without problems. Due to some sort of problem with a recent VMware upgrade my firewall VM wouldn't connect to my ISP so I purchased a small 'industrial' PC which was a Qotom Q750G5. I use OPNsense as a VM in my configuration. Server Interfaces WAN LAN VPN (VPN Tunnel) Server LAN: 10.0.1.0 Tunnel NET: 10.0.10.0 Client LAN: 172.16.1.0. 4.1 With pfSense 4.2 With EdgeRouter In this tutorial, we’ll see how to configure a site-to-site IPSec VPN with pfSense and a Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite router. AT that point I moved to OPNsense when they forked and still use it today without any problems. Server: PFSense Client: Ubiquiti Edgerouter. This release of WireGuard for the EdgeRouter is based on upstream WireGuard snapshot 1219. Click to the right of that entry to add another port forward based on the selected one. The easiest way to accomplish this is: Add a port forward on the first WAN connection as usual. The difference between the two is that a core router is essential in allowing. A given port can be opened on multiple WAN interfaces by using multiple port forward entries, one per WAN interface. I would always recommend OPNsense any day, I did use PFsense initially but the infighting on their forums and the practices mentioned above. Pfsense functions as a core router while edgerouter is as its name suggests. I'd agree with - Netgate and PFsense are products to avoid at all costs.
0 kommentar(er)
